Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 2010 And 2011

Floor Speech

BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT

Mr. PENCE. Mr. Chair, I rise in opposition to the Foreign Relations Authorization Act.

The American people deserve a foreign relations bill that respects our Nation's budget and our Nation's values. Sadly, H.R. 2410 does neither. At a time when ordinary Americans are struggling to make ends meet, this legislation would add billions of dollars in new funding to our foreign and State Department operations. Expanding taxpayer funding of Peace Corps and the U.N. regular budget by one-third in a single year without any U.N. reform is extraordinarily frustrating to many of us who have been fighting to use the power of the purse here in Washington, D.C., to drive fundamental reform in that body.

But beyond these extraordinary increases--a single-year increase of 35 percent in the State Department's basic salary and operations--this legislation does a disservice to the values of millions of Americans who cherish the sanctity of life and the sanctity of marriage. This legislation creates a new office and ambassador for global women's issues for women's empowerment internationally. Secretary Clinton testified before our committee that it would be the policy of this administration to protect the rights of women, including rights to reproductive health. Democrats on the committee actually rejected an amendment to clarify that it would not be U.S. policy to lobby countries to legalize, fund or promote abortion. I even offered an amendment in the committee to change language that would require State Department training, reporting, and overseas advocacy of foreign laws regarding homosexual activity. I sought to change that, to make it clear that State Department employees ought to promote universally recognized human rights, those upon which Americans agree; and that was rejected in the committee.

This legislation, in embracing abortion rights overseas, in embracing the advocacy of changes in laws regarding homosexuality around the world, advocates a set of values that are at odds with the majority of the American people. We deserve a foreign relations budget that respects our pocketbooks and our values. This does neither, and I urge its rejection.

BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT

Source